Q:I have a 1992 Nissan D21 series pickup with a 2.4l motor with a 5 speed transmission. In a straight line winding out 2nd, 3rd, and 4th gear i can only reach 75mph. Is there any way to get more power? I run 235/75/r15 tires on it.

nitrous oxide kit, doubles the BHP

Q:I owed the bank some money and I tried too direct deposit my tax return into my mothers account. I then found out the back took that money and paid the money back that I owed them. Is that legal?

Did you have an account in the same bank as your mother? When the refund hit your mother's account it was bounced into the Item Reject queue since your name was not on her account. A staffer in Item Processing checked it and noted that you had an account with the bank so they diverted it to your account instead of sending it back to the IRS. That's perfectly legal, by the way. Since you owed the bank money, they exercised their Right of Offset to pay down the debt that you owed them. That too is perfectly legal, and is spelled out in the contract that you have with the bank.

Q:I went to one of the major banks in Australia as a non-customer with $80 worth of $20 Australian notes wanting to exchange them for $10 Australian notes and they said it will cost 10% ($8) to do it. How can it cost so much money to change money in the same currency? I can understand it costing money if it was a lot of money or I brought in heap of coins but this was literally 4 notes! Why are they so greedy for money hitting people who can least afford it?

This was just the bank's way of saying 'no' to you. Government rules probably say that banks must change money for consumers. So, the bank is following the letter but not the spirit of this rule. They are willing to change money for you. But they know that you probably won't want to change your money when they require you to pay 10% for this service. I suggest that you complain to your elected representative in the Australian Parliament. It's the elected politicians who make the rules and the laws for banks. And they have the power to change the way banks operate.

Q:Does the Federal Reserve have the same power that the Bank of the US had in the early 1800s (the bank that Andrew Jackson vetoed)?If not, what power did the Bank of the US have that the Federal Reserve does not have?

no money was backed in gold back then

Q:1. concentrate power and wealth in the hands of a few2. admit too many immigrants3. discourage the growth of the market economy4. abolish the national bankI seem to be stuck, can someone help me please?

I belive they would concentrate power and wealth in the hands of a few becuase the thing America became great on (gold) was slowly being handed over to banks. In 1913 a bill was passed that gave economic control to three powerful banks. This bill was passed in December and on a day when numerous politicians were with their family, the bill passed. Now the Goverment takes out loans with these banks at high intrest leaving us needing to Police the world and secure the one thing we must keep, Oil. In short, Power goes to those whom have major finacial backing. They make the decicions and we follow. Sorry to ramble on, but this is how I would awnser your question!

Q:Currently the FED prints dollars and lends it to local banks (often at zero percent).However, why are they lending it? Why not just sell the currency for the cost of printing and administration overhead? If you give me a trillion dollars - that cost you 50 million to produce - and expect a trillion in return, that is a 20,000 percent markup on your product!Therefore Libertarians and independents are smacking their heads asking why?! Why do we engage in a monetary system that has such immense cost and automatic debt to us the tax-payer? Please help me out and explain if I have misunderstood the system.thank you!

Ending the fed does not equal nationalize central banking. Whoever told you that was trolling you

Q:I am under the opinion that the Federal Reserve System and our Banking industry has gotten us into this huge financial mess we are in today.I am also under the opinion that the Federal Reserve System as well as our Banking Industry needs to be under a much closer eye then they are today. In our Banking Industry, that can be a combination of private enterprise and far tighter government oversight and control. Our Federal Reserve System needs to be totally transparent and a public entity, instead of what it is now, a private one where not even our government knows who all the players are, or what really goes on behind their closed doors.Your input please.

I think the government is covertly being run by the banks. The banks are like a fourth branch of government. Think about it. The banks were first created by Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr. Chase Bank which has now merged with J.P. Morgan, still operates under it's original 1799 charter. Chase Bank still owns the dueling pistols used by Hamilton and Burr. The Chase Bank was the Rockefeller Bank. John D. Rockefeller, Jr. was married to Sen. Nelson Aldrich's daughter. Sen. Aldrich sponsored the legislation that created the federal reserve bank. You can read about the Whitney family and the Payne family and see the connections they had between politics, standard oil and the banking business. Government cannot operate without the banks, and the banks cannot operate without the help of government. One the politicians leave office, they are naturally attracted to the greedy profession of banking. Look at Prescott Bush and his relationship with Brown Brothers Harriman. Take a look at Archibald Roosevelt, son of FDR who worked at the Chase Bank for Rockefeller. The list of people moving from government to banking is very long indeed. How many treasury secretarys can you count that came from the banking field and went back into it after leaving office? There is a revolving door between politics and banking that is mostly invisible to the public. So, where does banking end and government begin? Probably the answer can be found on the balance sheet of the companies in their portfolio's. If all the former politicians of the past 100 years, their families, and their descendants had all their money tied up in J.P. Morgan Chase Bank/Citicorp, with the descendants of those politicians on the boards of directors, that almost sounds like a government banking operation to me. There is no hope for us, my friend.

Q:I am helping someone who is mentally disabled but not enough to be put in a home. They just dont understand the math or banking and or fraud system. They ordered something that was on line and found out later it was a fraud.(took out of account right away and keeps doing it when there was suppose to be a trial period of 30 days and took out 3 days later) The bank keeps crediting it then taking it back. Also they let the company who is fraudlant keep taking out of their account monthly. I asked them if they did a stop payment and the couple said yes(i can not go with them to the bank since off privacy rights I am just a neighbor), They need an advocate to go in with them to get this straightened out. Is their an agency they can go to to help them? Thanks

felony fraud. exciting term. An oxymoron. yet, confident, I do agree that this is felony fraud, in that the *banks* are those that are incomes pastime on that our online worldwide funds collectively as this is pending pass from one financial company account to the different. this is reminiscent of a few of the banking rules here interior the united states. particular sorts of gadgets for deposits could be held with the help of the financial company for 7 days till now a withdrawal could be made against the money. The banks frequently state that the clarification is to insure that the tool clears, i.e. that there are sufficient funds interior the originating account. besides the undeniable fact that, the financial company is somewhat incomes pastime on your funds collectively as you won't be able to apply it.

Q:Can bank pay a transaction eventhough you told them not to pay? And then give you a negative balance, and then charge you overdraft fee?

yes they can when you cancel a check it isn't a promise that they will catch it. And if you maybe gave them the wrong amount that the check was worth they have lots of ways to make money off of you!!!

Q:I recently watched the documentary of the same name, and, while I realize the producer might be biased or what have you, it makes a lot of sense. So my question is, do you believe it? Perhaps not to the extent that Peter Joseph does, but do you believe it's possible that the government(s) are controlled by the big money players that run the banks and corporations? In an attempt to place every American in debt and control the economy?Reason I can't put it past them is due to what I know about big corporations back in the day, aka Standard Oil and the shady business practices Rockefeller engaged in that remain to this day, the monopolies and suchDo you believe, especially in this excuse for an economy, that big corporations and government is there to help us and make the US profitable, or to suck consumers dry like a parasite?

I understand merchandising and marketing, yet a stupid advertisement or subliminal message isn't forcing me to purchase something. some persons have restraint and are not emotional shoppers. ** I understand that. Consumerism is a disease and maximum persons are starting to be caught up in this especially situations. We probable all have extra desirable than we surely choose, yet whose fault is that truly? i don't blame the corporate, I blame myself while i purchase issues that i don't choose. I even have discovered to invite myself, Do i choose it, or do i choose for it. If I merely quit and ask myself that one trouble-free question i'm in a position to quit myself. it is the place restraint comes into play.