Q:The first panel is located in New England, the second is placed in the Sahara desert, the third is on the Earth side of the moon, and the last is on the far side of the moon. Which panel would absorb the most sunlight over a year's time and why ? All the panels are place in optimal places where they would get the most light available.

Well, as always, context is important. Sunlight is composed of a lot of different types and wavelengths of energy, and our atmosphere and magnetoshpere filter out a certain amount. If the question is actually which solar panel would produce the most energy (which I assume it is), we would have to look at how solar panels work. There are three different classes of solar panel function. Photovoltaic cells convert sunlight directly into electrical energy, but most systems are pretty low on efficiency. Solar cells can be used for generating heat, through boiling water or some other liquid frequently. And solar panels can be used to produce chemical reactions, breaking down solutions into ions, for example, and the breaking of the molecular bonds releases a certain amount of energy. So theoretically, the two sides of the moon get the same amount of solar energy, just at different times -- about 6 months of the year or so. If the solar panels were thermal energy panels, the ones on the Earth would do much better, because the moon is so much colder. The weather is the most convincing argument for comparing the Sahara and New England. New England is likely to be more cloudy and polluted than the Sahara. Since the Earth probably eclipses the moon a bit more often than the reverse, there may be a little more visible sunlight that gets to earthly solar panels, but the ones on the moon would get a greater proportion of the sunlight (more wavelengths, for example), so it would be close. The Earth eclipses only the near face of the moon, so that would give the far side of the moon a slight edge perhaps. I'd guess it would be the far-side lunar one, but too many variables to be sure.

Q:How much electricity can a solar panel generate?

The amount of electricity a solar panel can generate depends on several factors such as the size and efficiency of the panel, the amount of sunlight it receives, and any shading or obstructions. On average, a typical solar panel can generate between 250 to 400 watts of electricity per hour.

Q:Interested in buying solar panels to save on electric bill.Any government help plans?

I don't believe that there is any help yet.

Q:I don't see much solar panels on people's houses where I live. I got a long time to go before doing so but I was planning on buying a few solar panels when I retire in the far future. In your opinion, is such an investment worth it? Would you buy them? I realize they are very expensive hence why I said when I retire. Thanks for your opinion

You ask a great question, because this should really be a financial decision, and not only an environmental one. Depending on which state you live in, the payback on a system is often in the 5 to 2 year range. The great thing about solar panels is that the fuel source is free and you don't need to speculate on your future costs. You pay for the equipment up front, and then you just enjoy the free power. Most solar panel systems last at least 30 years, so compare the cost of solar panels to paying your average electric bill 360 times. And that does not include any inflation of energy cost increase. Check out our website to learn more.

Q:How much electricity can a solar panel produce?

The amount of electricity a solar panel can produce depends on various factors such as the size and efficiency of the panel, the amount of sunlight it receives, and the location. On average, a standard solar panel can produce anywhere between 250 to 400 watts of electricity per hour.

Q:What is the impact of snow accumulation on solar panels' performance?

Snow accumulation on solar panels can significantly reduce their performance. The layer of snow acts as a barrier, preventing sunlight from reaching the panels and reducing their ability to generate electricity. Additionally, the weight of the snow can cause structural damage to the panels if not properly cleared, potentially leading to long-term issues. Therefore, it is important to remove snow from solar panels to ensure optimal performance and longevity.

Q:How can solar panels be used for heating water?

Solar panels can be used for heating water by capturing sunlight and converting it into electricity. This electricity can then be used to power heating elements or heat pumps that warm up water for various purposes, such as domestic use or swimming pools.

Q:Are there any government incentives or tax credits for installing solar panels?

Yes, there are government incentives and tax credits available for installing solar panels. These incentives vary by country and region, but they often include federal tax credits, state or provincial rebates, and local grants or loans. These financial incentives aim to promote the adoption of renewable energy sources and help offset the initial costs of installing solar panels. It is advisable to consult local authorities or renewable energy organizations to learn about specific incentives available in your area.

Q:Can solar panels be used in areas with high levels of snowfall?

Yes, solar panels can still be used in areas with high levels of snowfall. While snow accumulation on the panels can temporarily reduce their efficiency, modern solar panel designs and technologies have improved to withstand heavy snow loads. Additionally, the angle at which solar panels are installed and their smooth surface can help snow easily slide off, allowing them to continue generating electricity even in snowy conditions.

Q:Hello from SO TX.. I would like to know if anyone out there has SOLAR PANELS on their home?I have a 850 sq ft. house. I called Austin to a company that offers panels and installation. The cost $8,000.00, for 0 panels . The rep said we would save about 2 to 25% on our electric bill /mo. We use approximately 980 kw/mo. Our bill is around $40.00 / mo...I really don't think that's a good enough savings. We figure it would take 25 years to recoup our investment.And where we live in TX it does not offer any incentives. The gov. allows you a $2000.00 tx break.

$8,000 invested at 5% interest would pay you $900 per year for the rest of your life. If you spend $40 per month and would save 25% of that, you would save $420 per year. To be fair, the savings would creep up with the electric rates but this would be off-set by maintenance cost and equipment attrition.